Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

What Change?

Monday, December 15th, 2008

It will be business as usual in Washington D.C., a CHANGE of guard, but it will be the same old tyranny. Please take the time to read Pastor Chuck Baldwin’s excellent essay on what we can expect from an Obama administration and why. Wicked this way comes.

Gary

One reason why it is so easy to predict a business-as-usual Obama Presidency is the people that Obama has surrounded himself with. Former New York Federal Reserve chairman Timothy Geithner* for Secretary of the Treasury; former Secretary of the Treasury Lawrence Summers* for National Economic Council director; Bush’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates* will keep his job; Illinois Representative Rahm Emanuel for Obama’s Chief of Staff; Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State; Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano* for Secretary of Homeland Security; former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle* to head the Health and Human Services Department; former Assistant Attorney General Eric Holder to be Attorney General; New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson* as Secretary of Commerce; Susan Rice* for U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Paul Volcker* for the Economic Recovery Advisory Board; James Steinberg* as Deputy Secretary of State; Mona Sutphen* for Deputy White House Chief of Staff, and Louis Caldera* for Director of the White House Military Office.Read More

We Need To Come Home

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

This video is a bit shaky at first, but well worth watching. We need to get out of the Middle East and surely not commit to any aggressive action against Iraq, as Senator John McCain suggests. Go to the website below and scroll down to new video, It’s Time We Came Home.

Gary

http://www.dailypaul.com/

Flap over gays in church directory festers

Sunday, December 9th, 2007

Deacon chairMan Kathy Madeia said in a statement. “Our members have diverse opinions about many things, but what we have in common is our love for God, the church and each oher” . Balderdash! This is the kind of antinomianism that is destroying the witness of the church to the unsaved. If we do not call sin, in this case homosexuality, sin why in the world does anyone need a Saviour. Why would anyone look to Christ who shed His blood so that those who are DEAD in their sin might call on His name and be saved. God so hates homosexuality that He calls for the death penalty on those who practice it in Leviticus 20:13. And in the New Testament church, according to Paul in Romans 1:27, it is still an abomination, ” And likewise also men, leaving the NATURAL use of the woman, burned in their LUST one toward another; men with men working that which is UNSEEMLY, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet”.

This congregation neither loves the God of the Bible nor the church if they do not condemn the homosexual and call him to repent of his sin and embrace the only Savior the world has, the Lord Jesus Christ, who stated about the Law Of God in Matthew 5, that not one jot or title had passed away. Christ came to confirm it. Nor is this congregation showing love toward one another if they do not call their homosexual members to repent and turn to Jesus, for they will be condemning them to an eternity in hell. The least of their worries is whether they should include homosexual couples in their directory.

Gary

FORT WORTH, Texas (BP)–Members of Broadway Baptist Church in Fort Worth, Texas, voted Dec. 2 to delay a decision on whether to include homosexual members as couples in a church pictorial directory.
Baptist Press broke the story of the church contention on Nov. 6. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram said the church’s deacons would recommend a solution to the issue by Feb. 4.
“We do not want to rush to make a decision, but rather to continue to listen to each other and for God’s leading to our church,” deacon chairman Kathy Madeja said in a statement. “Our members have diverse opinions about many things, but what we have in common is our love for God, the church and each oher” …Please Read On

Implantable Microchips: NOT a Conspiracy Theory Anymore

Monday, September 10th, 2007

Several years ago I was considered a kook for even suggesting such an idea. Today it is a reality.
Please read the rest of this article and view the videos.
Gary

September 10, 2007

Implantable Microchips: NOT a Conspiracy Theory Anymore
It’s getting more difficult these days to sustain the preterist view of eschatology (preterism contends that the virtually all of the “last days” events took place no later than A.D. 70) when companies are pushing to place implantable microchips within the actual bodies of people. End-time prophecy teachers have long stated that microchipping may be the fulfillment of Revelation 13:16-17:
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man may buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
My intent is not to wrestle with the eschatological debate, but to highlight AGAIN the growing draconian measures being pushed on all of us. Years ago, skeptics dismissed people as “wacko conspiracy theorists” for warning about the coming implantable microchip. They also warned about a National ID card, which will become a reality in May of 2008.

In 2005, the FDA approved implanting microchips in humans. To date, some 2,000 people around the world have RFID chips implanted in their skin. The company VeriChip Corp. has a goal of implanting 45 million Americans with medical monitoring chips. A person’s entire medical history can be stored on the chip.

Critics claim that the next step–after National ID cards–is to to microchip the entire population with all their personal information such as banking info, driver’s info, medical info, etc. You’ve probably seen the Visa credit card commercials when a person stops the flow of business by using cash or writing a check. Everyone else just glides their credit card across the scanner and they’re done. It’s easy to see after cash and cards, a single implanted chip is the ultimate technological solution. Visa’s tagline is “Life takes faster money. Life takes Visa.”

VeriChip had enlisted Tommy Thompson to its board in hopes of promoting the program. Thompson was going to run for president in 2008, but has since dropped out. Listen to this monster argue with a smile for the microchip–this is staggering:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiLixwNkur8

Do you honestly believe that VeriChip is going to limit this technology to medical and child safety? Isn’t financial support next? Listen to Ron Paul and a few “other” experts talk about this development: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOMhNb6jtrg

HOW IS THIS FREEDOM??? HOW CAN WE PERMIT OUR POLITICIANS TO CONTINUE TO LIE TO US IN SAYING THAT THE WAR ON TERROR IS A WAR FOR FREEDOM? OUR FREEDOMS ARE VANISHING QUICKLY AND THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT STILL SAYS NOTHING!! EVEN SOME OF OUR OWN COLLEAGUES ARE ABSOLUTELY SILENT ON THESE ISSUES. THEY’RE ARGUING OVER FEDERAL VISION NONSENSE, POSTMODERNISM, CULTURAL RELEVANCE, THE RELIGIOUS INTENT OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS, AND RALLYING SUPPORT FOR UNJUST WAR!

There, I said it.
posted by Chris Ortiz at 12:11 PM

Florida mayor loses seat on tourism board over alleged ‘anti-homosexual’ remarks

Tuesday, September 4th, 2007

Praise God for men like Mayor Naugle of Fort Lauderdale, Florida for taking such a bold stand against homosexuality and its perversions. If only America had more men who had such strong Biblical convictions and was willing to wear them on his sleeve, no matter the cost.

Gary

Allie Martin and Jody Brown OneNewsNow.comSeptember 4, 2007
The mayor of Fort Lauderdale has been removed from the local tourism board because local officials feel his comments regarding homosexual activity in the area threaten the tourism industry and the billions of dollars it brings to Broward County.

Earlier this summer, Fort Lauderdale Mayor Jim Naugle apologized to parents for not realizing the extent of homosexual sex in public restrooms. He also said a pro-homosexual library should not be housed in a city building because it included pornography. (See related article)

Those comments have now cost the mayor his seat on the Tourism Development Council, a group that markets Broward County to tourists and conventions. Members of the county commission had accused the mayor of jeopardizing the area’s multibillion-dollar tourism industry.

But Naugle argues that many locals want public lewdness laws to be enforced. He says his city has become known as a popular spot for homosexuals who cruise for sex in public locations — and he wants to see that change.

“There’s been kind of an open attitude here that anything goes,” he says, “and it’s something we’re going to put a stop to. People are welcome to come to Fort Lauderdale, but they need to be respectful of our laws,” Naugle cautions.

According to the Fort Lauderdale mayor, one in five homosexual and bisexual men in the city are HIV positive and the city leads the nation in AIDS cases among homosexual men. “That’s what happens when you have too much political correctness and too much of this notion of tolerance that we have to accept everything,” he states. “It can be deadly.”

WSVN-TV in Fort Lauderdale reports that prior to the county commissioners’ unanimous decision to remove Mayor Naugle, he stated that removing him from the Tourism Development Council would not silence him. “My faith says that homosexuality is a sin,” Naugle said. “One of the things my father taught me is it’s not always about the money; it’s about doing what’s right.”

Domestic Use of Spy Satellites To Widen Law Enforcement Getting New Access To Secret Imagery

Saturday, August 18th, 2007

My son was laughed out of one of his Sunday school classes 10 years ago because he dared to mention the possibility of the federal government being able to watch our every move in our homes. After all what purpose would our “benevolent” government have to look in on our home life? Well the future is here and my son is the one laughing underneath his concern for our loss of more freedom. We must throw out everyone of our elected officials. I hear nothing coming out of Washington in protest. Hopefully we have not waited too long. When we trust men more than God, this is what we get.

Gary

By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 16, 2007; Page A01

The Bush administration has approved a plan to expand domestic access to some of the most powerful tools of 21st-century spycraft, giving law enforcement officials and others the ability to view data obtained from satellite and aircraft sensors that can see through cloud cover and even penetrate buildings and underground bunkers.

A program approved by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security will allow broader domestic use of secret overhead imagery beginning as early as this fall, with the expectation that state and local law enforcement officials will eventually be able to tap into technology once largely restricted to foreign surveillance.

Administration officials say the program will give domestic security and emergency preparedness agencies new capabilities in dealing with a range of threats, from illegal immigration and terrorism to hurricanes and forest fires. But the program, described yesterday by the Wall Street Journal, quickly provoked opposition from civil liberties advocates, who said the government is crossing a well-established line against the use of military assets in domestic law enforcement.

Although the federal government has long permitted the use of spy-satellite imagery for certain scientific functions — such as creating topographic maps or monitoring volcanic activity — the administration’s decision would provide domestic authorities with unprecedented access to high-resolution, real-time satellite photos.

They could also have access to much more. A statement issued yesterday by the Department of Homeland Security said that officials envision “more robust access” not only to imagery but also to “the collection, analysis and production skills and capabilities of the intelligence community.”

The beneficiaries may include “federal, state, local and tribal elements” involved in emergency preparedness and response or “enforcement of criminal and civil laws.” The “tribal” reference was to Native Americans who conduct semiautonomous law enforcement operations on reservations.

“These systems are already used to help us respond to crises,” Charles Allen, the chief intelligence officer for the Department of Homeland Security, said in a telephone interview. “We anticipate that we can also use it to protect Americans by preventing the entry of dangerous people and goods into the country, and by helping us examine critical infrastructure for vulnerabilities.”

Domestic security officials already have access to commercial satellite imagery, including the high-definition photographs available from Google and other private vendors. But spy satellites offer much greater resolution and provide images in real time, said Jeffrey T. Richelson, an expert on space-based surveillance and a senior fellow with the National Security Archive in Washington.

“You also can get more coverage more often,” Richelson said. “These satellites will cover during the course of their orbits the entire United States. They will be operating 24 hours a day and using infrared cameras at night.”

Other nonvisual capabilities can be provided by aircraft-based sensors, which include ground-penetrating radar and highly sensitive detectors that can sense electromagnetic activity, radioactivity or traces of chemicals, military experts said. Such radar can be used to find objects hidden in buildings or bunkers.

One possible use of the technology would be to spot staging areas along smuggling routes used to transport narcotics or illegal immigrants, officials said. In a handful of cases, security officials have requested — and obtained — similar help, but only on a case-by-case basis.

Allen said the agreement with the DNI grew out of the general impetus for wider intelligence-sharing in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when administration and intelligence officials began examining the possibility of increasing officials’ access to secret data as a means of strengthening the nation’s defenses.

The program was formally authorized in May in a memo by Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. The two officials have been coordinating for months, as recommended in a 2005 study headed by Keith Hall, then the director of the National Reconnaissance Office.

Hall’s group cited an “urgent need” for expanding sharing of remote sensing data to domestic groups other than scientific researchers. “Opportunities to better protect the nation are being missed,” the report said.

Under the new program, the DHS will create a subordinate agency to be known as the National Applications Office. The new office, which has gained the backing of congressional intelligence and appropriations committees, is responsible for coordinating requests for access to intelligence by civilian agencies. Previously, an agency known as the Civilian Applications Committee facilitated access to satellite imagery for geologic study.

Oversight of the department’s use of the overhead imagery data would come from officials in the Department of Homeland Security and from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and would consist of reviews by agency inspectors general, lawyers and privacy officers. “We can give total assurance” that Americans’ civil liberties will be protected, Allen said. “Americans shouldn’t have any concerns about it.”

But civil liberties groups quickly condemned the move, which Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies, a nonprofit activist group, likened to “Big Brother in the sky.” “They want to turn these enormous spy capabilities, built to be used against overseas enemies, onto Americans,” Martin said. “They are laying the bricks one at a time for a police state.”

Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists, said that the data could be useful but that oversight for the program was woefully inadequate. Enhanced access “shouldn’t be adopted at all costs because it comes with risk to privacy and to the integrity of our political institutions,” he said.

What Does “Fed Pumps $68 Billion into Banking System” Actually Mean?

Monday, August 13th, 2007

This is a two part series that is a must read for all of you if you desire to be aware of disastrous American money and credit policy and if you desire to keep your financial head above water. And I certainly hope you have a desire for both or you will drown like a large percentage of our fellow countrymen are all ready doing. It may be too late to stem the tied of our nation, although we must not give up trying, but you can at least bolster your own financial position before disaster arrives. Of course to do so you must have the necessary information to do so, which your “manipulated” media is not about to give to you. Devvy not only has the design well figured out, but she also a good handle on the cure, although it means diligence on our part.

Gary

By: Devvy
August 13, 2007
© 2007 – NewsWithViews.com
Last week saw a bucking bronco ride in the stock market. The American people read headlines such as: Fed vows, then pumps massive funds to calm markets and Fed’s $38 billion helps markets. I have written many columns the past several years as have hundreds of others warning of the coming financial tsunami. Far too many people scoffed at all the warnings, continued to rack up massive debt and pursued the American dream of owning their own home when their financial portfolio and credit history simply could not float the big boat they were taking out into the ocean. The first of the dominos began to teeter earlier in the week: Aug. 6 (Bloomberg) — “American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. became the second-biggest residential lender to file for bankruptcy protection this year, adding to signs that late payments have spread to homeowners with good credit records.” Please don’t stop here read on.

Here is the real Che Guevara

Saturday, July 14th, 2007

It disgusts me to see the twenty and thirty year old crowd wear T-shurts with this tugs mug on it. Read this article and the next time you see someone wearing one of those T-shirts let him know the truth about this international communist thug.

Gary

CHE GUEVARA: PC ICON

By Larry Pratt
July 14, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

Che Guevara’s image graces many a T-shirt worn in the US. Wearing one of these seems to be intended as a statement that it is good to be free of the crushing norms of a civilization tricked up by dead white men.

The T-shirt image depicts a long-haired 1960’s hippy gazing steadfastly into the future.

The truth is, Ernesto “Che” Guevara, the one-time number three in Fidel Castro’s thugocracy, would have had a guy looking like Guevara’s resemblance arrested and sent to a concentration camp known by their acronym: UMAP (Military Units for the Promotion of Production). Guevara was resolutely against rock and roll and its long-haired adherents. Long after his demise his grandson was rousted by the Cuban police for being a rocker.

Che is revered today as one who was above materialism, but he sure did not get that memo when he stole one of the largest mansions in Cuba. While he remained in Cuba, he lived and entertained in the lap of luxury.

As Minister of the Economy, Che drove Cuba into the ground. The country had been more prosperous than France, but in a short period of time, it became a place even fleeing Haitians avoided. This was not a failure in socialist terms. By impoverishing the whole country, the thugocracy ensured that there would be much less opportunity to oppose them.

The objective of Che and the Castro brothers was to monopolize power. In addition to bankrupting the country, gun confiscations were carried out the day after seizing power. As the Nazis before them in Germany, the Cuban communists used the gun registration lists of the prior government for rounding up privately owned guns.

would begin for the day. The names of the accused were the same as those on the execution lists. Che’s judicial philosophy was captured in this quote: “I don’t need proof to execute a man I only need proof that it’s necessary to execute him.” (cited in Exposing the Real Che Guevara by Humberto Fontova, p. xxiii)

How ironic that the ignorant glitterati of the West so idolize Che. For example, rocker Carlos Santana (a man who would have been jailed by Che) displayed his IQ in public with this whopper: “Che is all about love and compassion, man.” (Fontova, photo caption)

The good thing about Che, if it can be put that way, is that he knew nothing about military tactics and strategy. For that matter, neither did the Castro brothers. Had it not been for fawning media coverage (”I got my job through the New York Times,” Castro could have said), even the incompetent Batista army could not have been overcome.

Fontova found much proof that when Che’s utility in Cuba had come to an end, this potential rival was “volunteered” to the Communist insurgency of Laurence Kabila in the Congo. The one thing Che was good at when combat overtook his headlong flight was getting his men killed. Soon after Che came to “lead” the Africans, they would have nothing to do with him.

Che decided he would start from scratch and tried to make Bolivia the next Cuba. In a stroke of “brilliance” Che divided his shrinking band of warriors in the Bolivian jungle. They were totally lost. From deserters and a few survivors it is clear that they were wandering in circles. It seems that the city boys could not even relate a compass to a map. At one point the two valiant bands of wanderers even shot at each other.

When the Bolivians caught up with Che, he had earlier that morning exhorted his remaining guerillas to fight to the end. When Che alone and fleeing to safety spotted Bolivian soldiers, he threw his guns down and pled for his life. The Bolivians wisely shot him soon after and well before the Western press could make his trial into an Historic Moment.

The next time you see someone sporting a Che Guevara T-shirt, you might want to share the real Che with the wearer.

INDEPENDENCE NOW AND FOREVER

Wednesday, July 4th, 2007

If we are to remain an independent free nation we must listen carefully to men such as Pastor Baldwin and then act as our Founding Fathers, doing all within our power to stop the treasonous acts of our “leaders”. We must no longer sit back ignoring their tyrannical acts, thinking things aren’t really that bad.
We must diligently strive to build God’s Kingdom here on earth. No longer trust the intrenched establishment players of the two major parties, no matter what our foolish Christian brothers say. We must find men truly sold out to Christ, who will fight for His truths, no matter the consequences, and then do all we possible can to get them voted to positions of civil authority. We can no longer remain complacent, unless of course your God given responsibility to bring all areas of your life into dominion to Christ means nothing to you.

Gary

INDEPENDENCE NOW AND FOREVER

By Pastor Chuck Baldwin
July 3, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
On this Independence Day, it behooves us to recall the principles of America’s founding, especially in light of the ongoing attempt by today’s political and commercial leaders to merge the United States into a hemispheric government. In fact, the clarion call for independence is just as fundamental, just as revolutionary as it was 230 years ago.

Regarding the signing of the Declaration of Independence John Adams said, “[Independence Day] will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the Day of Deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forevermore.”

Adams went on to say, “You will think me transported with enthusiasm, but I am not. I am well aware of the toil and blood and treasure that it will cost us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the gloom I can see the rays of ravishing light and glory; I can see that the end is more than worth all the means, that posterity will triumph in that day’s transaction, even though we should rue it, which I trust in God we shall not.”

Indeed, the signers of America’s Declaration of Independence endured the sacrifice of toil and blood. Pertaining to the lives of the signers, David Limbaugh writes, “Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his thirteen children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned.”

Yes, America’s Declaration of Independence, which is our nation’s birth certificate, was purchased at a very high price. Rightly did its primary author, Thomas Jefferson, invoke God’s name no less than four times in the Declaration. Without God, our struggle for independence and freedom would have surely failed!

Jefferson, along with the vast majority of America’s founders, knew that freedom was first the gift of God, not the accomplishment of men. He further understood that man’s law must be subordinate to the natural laws of God.

Therefore, with an appeal to Heaven for the “rectitude of [their] intentions,” America’s Founding Fathers courageously forged a document that would put their own lives at risk, but would also change the course of history.

The question now is, “How long can we maintain our nation’s independence?” The forces of global government seem to dominate both major parties in Washington, D.C., most corporate boardrooms, and most newsrooms (including the Fox News Channel).

In fact, hemispheric or regional government never had a more powerful and committed ally than President George W. Bush. Mark my words, if and when America loses its independence, it will have been G.W. Bush that led the way in making it happen. I will even be so bold as to say that G.W. Bush is the worst enemy American independence has had since old King George III of England!

Even as I write, Bush is pushing forward with his intentions to merge the United States into a trilateral government with Mexico and Canada. This is why he lobbied so intently for the just-defeated amnesty bill for illegal aliens. To George W. Bush, there is no such thing as an illegal alien, because he has already agreed to unite the three countries into one.

If the United States is going to maintain its independence and freedom much beyond the year 2010 (the year Bush’s new North American Union is scheduled to be in place), it will only be because millions of freedom-loving Americans are willing to fight for it.

Both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on July 4, 1826. Daniel Webster gave the eulogy for both men on August 2. Included in his remarks on that notable day were these words: “It [the Declaration of Independence] is my living sentiment, and by the blessing of God, it shall be my dying sentiment. Independence now, and independence forever.”

To Webster’s words, I say a hearty AMEN! I promise no loyalty to the North American Union, to the United Nations, or to any other brand of global government. When the day comes that I am required to submit to any form of global authority, I will be an outlaw! There is no freedom without independence, and there is no independence without eternal vigilance. To my dying breath I will say with Daniel Webster, “Independence now, and independence forever!”

(End note: we are still shipping FREEDOM DOCUMENTS, a compilation of 50 of America’s finest historical documents in one volume. Our supply is dwindling fast, so order your copy today!

© 2007 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

Bush envoy to affirm Islam is religion of ‘peace, tolerance, compassion’

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Has war with these people not awakened us to their violent nature? They are doing nothing more than following the nature of their faith, found in their holy writ, the Koran. For us to tolerate their faith in America could very well lead to their type of culture here, if we allow them to hold political office. Every Islamic nation is suppressive, without exception. Is that want we want? Is Bush really such a fool, or is he more interested in leveling all religious faiths and bringing about an amalgamation of nations, a One World Government?

Gary

Jim Brown OneNewsNow.comJune 29, 2007
A State Department spokesman says President Bush’s plan to appoint an envoy to a group of Islamic states reaffirms the U.S. government’s outreach to Muslim communities “based on mutual respect and understanding” and the belief that Islam is a “peaceful, tolerant, and compassionate” faith.

President Bush has announced he will name a special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), which represents 57 Muslim countries. Bush would be the first president to make such an appointment. The president made the announcement at a ceremony honoring the 50th anniversary of the Islamic Center of Washington. It was Bush’s third visit to the mosque.

State Department spokesman Gonzo Gallegos says President Bush wants Muslims to know they can live and worship as they choose without intimidation.

“The important thing is that we all know and understand that belief is central,” says Gallegos. “Belief in God is central to our existence on earth, and … the president is working to ensure that Muslims know and understand that our faith and their faith coincide and that we live together in harmony.”

According to Gallegos, Bush wants to ensure that the U.S. has a voice on the OIC that can express this belief. He says the envoy will maintain formal contact with OIC members and leaders and work with them to promote U.S. views on policy matters that may come before the OIC.

FireStats iconPowered by FireStats